Is it a talent or an effort to solve the abnormal shooting in the library xxjjyy.com

Analysis of the metamorphosis of the library basketball, he is relying on talent or efforts to metamorphosis library sina sports news first to clarify a concept, "library three points shooting Metamorphosis" this thing, in the end how to define?. Other answers also mentioned, Allen, Miller and Bird and others can be called "three points Metamorphosis", and now three points shooting strong by many people think far beyond predecessors, in the end is "Metamorphosis" where?. I believe that most people agree, "Metamorphosis" is mainly embodied in the "quasi", but we all know that three Curitiba shooting though in each season are among the best, but not more than 50% of the season, and reached the same shooter history is not in the minority, so in addition to the "quasi" curry also metamorphosis where? I think nothing more than the following three points: 1, the more the first look at this three hits the progress of comparison, the slope and other library history three basic no longer a distracted shooter quadrant, is indeed every season to vote more than the others. As you can see from the picture below, curry has the highest hit rate in the player with more than 2000+ shots, that is, the high hit rate is maintained in the high shot. Curry in the library so perverted, in the end is talent is more important, or effort is more important? 2, the far the picture to see the final column, a distance of three NBA line is 23.75 feet, and curry averaged 10.7 times out of the hands of 6.7 times from 25 feet, leading the second Lillard 2.5 times, the other players in the 4. 3, to this point is not very good data, we use pull up shoot to explain, on the map under the said definition, is 10 feet at least one dribble shot, shot this one in 3, is still the largest library, averaging 5.8 times. In conclusion, if we take the library of "abnormal" is defined as the cast, cast away, investment is difficult, but also investment, on the basis of this, look at the library before there is no such "abnormal quasi player is what causes: first, the evolution history of the NBA alliance knowledge of three pointers such a process of evolution, that is to say, in the introduction of three points for a long period of time, the coach did not let you throw a 10 three points, they think you’re the waves cast. In fact, before the introduction of the three line in NBA1979-1980 season, the entertainment oriented ABA League relies on the chromosphere and the three line to attract the audience, so it can not be blamed for NBA’s old men began to hold a disdain attitude towards three points. Second, the NBA alliance business oriented rules change television broadcasting, but NBA income source of the big head, the decline of attention for professional sports league is a disaster. How do you get the audience back in front of the TV? Call "Internet thinking" in the words of today, the "user centric" guidelines have been known to every family, but the president of adults ten years ago to know this well, experts put their shelves first in the world basketball league head, positive thinking)

解析库里的变态投篮 他是靠天赋还是靠努力 变态库里   新浪体育讯  首先要澄清一个概念,“库里三分投篮变态”这件事,到底如何定义。其他答案中也提到了,阿伦、米勒和伯德等人都可以被称为“三分变态”,而如今库里三分投篮之强被许多人认为远超前辈,到底是“变态”在哪了。   相信多数人都认同,“变态”主要是体现在“准”上,但大家也都知道库里的三分命中率虽然在每个赛季都名列前茅,但并未有超过50%的赛季,况且达到相同命中率的射手历史上也不在少数,那么除了“准”,库里还变态在哪了呢?   窃以为无非以下三点:   1、投的多   先看一下这个三分命中数的进度对比情况,库里的斜率和其他历史三分神射手基本不再一个象限,的的确确是每个赛季都投的比人家多。   从下图可以看到,库里是2000+以上出手的球员中命中率最高的,也就是在高出手的情况下保持了高命中率。   库里的投篮这么变态,到底是天赋更重要还是努力更重要?   2、投的远   这张图要看最后一栏,NBA的三分线距离是23.75英尺,而库里的场均10.7次出手中,有6.7次都在25英尺以外,领先第二名的利拉德2.5次,其他的球员都在4次上下。   3、投的难   这一点不太好数据量化,就用pull up shoot来说明吧,下面图上已经说了定义,就是10英尺外至少运一次球的投篮,在3分球出手这一项,依然是库里最多,场均达到了5.8次。   综上,如果我们把库里的“变态”定义为投的多,投的远,投的难,而且还能投的准,在此基础上,再来看库里以前没有这样“变态准”的球员的原因是什么:   第一,NBA联盟对三分球认识的历史演变过程   这样一个演变的过程,也就是说,在引入三分球很长的一段时间里,教练根本不会让你一场扔10个三分,他们觉得你就是在浪投。而其实在NBA1979-1980赛季引进三分线之前,以娱乐为导向的ABA联盟就靠着花色球和三分线来招徕观众,所以也不能怪NBA的老夫子们开始的时候对三分抱着鄙夷的态度。   第二,NBA联盟商业化导向的规则改变   电视转播可是NBA收入来源的大头,关注度的下降对职业体育联赛来说不啻为灭顶之灾。怎么才能让观众重新拉回电视前看球呢?在言必称“互联网思维”的今天,“以用户为中心”的准则已经家喻户晓,可是总裁大人十几年前就深谙此理,摆放下自己世界第一篮球联赛掌门人的专家架子,积极换位思考,其实无外乎两条:第一是比赛的观赏程度和流畅性, 简单说就是让篮球比赛更好。   在此商业思维的影响之下,NBA的规则无疑将会朝着有利于外线明星发挥的方向改变。   一方面,内线的低位进攻难度增大   另一方面,三分球的防守强度下降,三分球的成功率上升   让所有的NBA教练都明白了一个简单的算术题:   3*40% > 2*50%   因而,三分球战术遂逐渐成为各只球队的必备战术之一,而近年来更是上升为常规战术,具体到勇士队,三分战术已经成为最主要的战术发起套路,也是关键时刻最为常用的杀手锏战术,所以也就不难理解库里获得了大量的三分出手权,以及专门为其设计的三分战术。   最后,也可能是最重要的一点:库里本人的天赋   很多人之所以认为库里的“身体素质不是特别强”,考察的指标应该多是身高、体重、最大弹跳高度、卧推等等体侧指标,亦或者只是一个笼统的概念。   但是当我们谈论“三分球这个领域”的时候,以上这些显性的身体素质标准是否能够起到作用呢?   如果只比刚过半场的logo shot,也许在静态状态下可以和库里比一比命中率的NBA球员不在少数,但是为什么在激烈的比赛对抗中,只有库里投了这么多tough shot还能保持如此高的命中率呢?   “投篮”本身的确是一项天赋,虽然很多投篮技巧可以靠后天习得,但是作为篮球的“核心技能”,投篮本身是一项高度要求身体各部分配合协调的技术:   在高速的运球和变向中突然急停出手,这种人球结合的手眼协调性是否算是一种天赋?   在对手的围追堵截之中,以快于NBA平均水平0.2s的出手速度极速出手,这种大脑和手臂之间快速的神级传递又是否算是一种天赋?   举一个不恰当的例子,最强调所谓“身体素质”的篮球技术要算是扣篮了吧,但是为什么被认为历史最佳的扣将是原地垂直弹跳36英寸的卡特,而不是原地垂直弹跳39.5英寸的尼克扬?   科尔在采访中曾经说:““想要像库里一样投篮,从技术的角度也许的确说得通,但是这也好像是在说,‘我想像斯科蒂-皮蓬那样跳跃一样。”   格林更现实,他说:“我能竭尽所能刻苦训练,但我永远不会像库里那样投篮。”   因而我坚定的认为,库里之所以有可能会成为有史以来最“变态”的射手,天赋的因素比努力训练更为重要,就如同爱迪生那句广为流传的名言:   “天才就是1%的天分加上99%的汗水,   但那1%的天分是最重要的,甚至比那99%的汗水都要重要”。   (德译洋洋)相关的主题文章: