Ministry of Civil Affairs Hebei pension institutions should avoid redundant construction – Sohu news

The Ministry of Civil Affairs: Hebei pension institutions should avoid duplication of news Sohu – Beijing daily news (reporter Jiang Mengwei) with the concept of Beijing pension circle gradually surfaced, in the end what the surrounding Beijing city to become the direct beneficiaries of Beijing pension demand spillovers from all walks of life, Public opinions are divergent. Beijing Civil Affairs Bureau Director Li Wanjun previously disclosed that, in the future, Hebei will require all counties around Beijing in Hebei province to build a link with the Beijing pension institutions. In this regard, the Ministry of civil affairs to the relevant person in charge of the Beijing Daily reporter exclusive said, pension demand at this stage Beijing City overflowed exactly how much volume is uncertain, around the city of Beijing if the pension institutions eager to comprehensive construction of the elderly in Beijing for it, there may be homogenization, repeated construction risk, need overall planning after investment and construction. Last year, Li Wanjun publicly stated that Beijing will no longer add new pension institutions news, triggering the capital shock. At that time, the pension enterprises responsible person told the Beijing Daily reporter, originally part of wandering in the Beijing pension market, for investment to build a large volume of endowment project in Beijing capital after hearing the news, quickly discuss coping strategies, start out of Beijing Tianjin Hebei "bigmap" select foothold. With the Hebei Gaobeidian and Laishui two large, mainly for the elderly in Beijing pension project into people’s vision, the Beijing Tianjin Hebei pension circle also began to accelerate shaping. However, Beijing surrounding so many adjacent, bordering cities, pension industry base and other conditions are also very similar, Beijing spillover pension demand in the end what are the directions to choose? Previously, director of the Hebei provincial Civil Affairs Department Zhao Feng Lou worked in Hebei province to promote Beijing Tianjin Hebei collaborative development of pension service industry seminar gives an answer, he said, Hebei in the province of 11 municipalities and county (city), Beijing and Tianjin will be the construction of a certain size, at least 1 of all facilities, complete function complete, basically meet the demand for pension services to three of the medical support integration demonstration base or old-age pension service facilities, build Beijing and Tianjin and the first off-site pension pension services industry gathering. The Ministry of civil affairs official suggested that the current Beijing Beijing for the elderly pension universal acceptance is not high, the formation of consumption habits also requires a certain process, and in the end what kind of pension service supply outside Beijing Beijing is more in line with the needs of the elderly also need to explore, because this proposal Tianjin and Hebei "long" and thoroughly, the comprehensive investigation on the market, targeted selection of several batches of pilot pension collaboration, will own more choice to the social capital, but not required where how much to the construction of pension institutions.

民政部:冀养老机构应避免重复建设-搜狐新闻  北京商报讯(记者 蒋梦惟)随着环京养老圈的概念逐渐浮出水面,到底北京周边有哪些城市能成为北京养老需求外溢的直接受益者,各界众说纷纭。北京市民政局局长李万钧此前透露,今后,河北将要求北京周边所有河北省内的县市都要建设一所和北京衔接的养老机构。对此,民政部相关负责人向北京商报记者独家表示,现阶段北京市内外溢的养老需求到底体量有多大还不确定,北京周边的城市如果急于全面建设面向北京老人的养老机构的话,可能存在同质化、重复建设风险,需要整体统筹规划后再投建。   去年,李万钧公开表态称北京将不再新增大型养老机构的消息引发各路资本震动。当时,有养老企业负责人告诉北京商报记者,部分原本徘徊在北京养老市场上,准备在京投建大体量养老项目的资本听到这一消息后,都迅速研讨应对策略,开始拿出京津冀的“大地图”选择落脚点。而随着位于河北高碑店和涞水的两个大型、主要面向北京老人的养老项目进入人们的视野后,京津冀养老圈也开始加速成型。   不过,北京周边那么多临近、接壤的城市,养老产业基础等条件也大同小异,北京外溢的养老需求到底有哪些方向可以选择呢?   此前,河北省民政厅厅长赵风楼曾在河北省推进京津冀养老服务业协同发展研讨会上给出了一种答案,他表示,河北计划在省内11个设区市和环京津县(市),都将建设至少1所有一定规模、设施完备、功能齐全、基本满足三地养老服务需求的医养结合型示范养老基地或养老服务设施,打造北京异地养老首选地和京津冀养老服务产业聚集地。   上述民政部相关负责人建议,目前京籍老人对于出京养老普遍接受度还不高,这一消费习惯的形成还需要一定过程,而且到底京外哪种养老服务供给更符合北京老年人的需求也还需要探索,因此建议京津冀三地“从长计议”,对市场进行全面的摸底、调查,有针对性的选择几批试点进行养老协同,将更多的自主选择权交给社会资本,而不是一定要求哪些地方必须建设多少所养老机构等。相关的主题文章: